EARLY TRANSISTOR
AND DIODE HISTORY AT BELL LABS Art Uhlir Jr. |
||
Oral History – Art Uhlir Jr. (Continued) |
|
|
I was much earlier interested in anodizing, having done a senior project on phosphoric
acid anodizing of aluminum, while working at a wartime aircraft plant. But in
the case of germanium, we made no attempt to try anodizing on the
grown-junction channel problem because we were persuaded at the outset that
the solubility of the oxide made anodizing unlikely to be even as useful as
the red lead. However, the alloy junction transistor could be made even more
attractive if the base region geometry could be shaped. We quickly learned that we could localize
electrolytic etching of N-type germanium by injection and depletion of holes
at a junction. Light would also inject holes. Additional localization could
be provided with “virtual-cathode” electrolytic micromachining. Reversing the
current made it possible to plate spots of metal. The techniques were at hand for making much higher frequency
germanium transistors. But the silicon diffused-base
transistor had arrived and we were redeployed to the urgent microwave-diode
project. However, someone had just given us a reject P-type silicon crystal –
too small to yield wafers for the transistor line and anyway not the N-type
used for NPN's. We thought we ought
to at least see if electrolytic polishing could remove saw damage. And P-type
had plenty of holes without illumination. |
We started with low current as the best way to measure the
etching valence with less chance of interfering secondary reactions. Even so,
bubbles appeared at the anode. The first thought (from anodizing experience)
was that some of the current was being waste by electrolysis of water to give
oxygen. But the apparent valence turned out to be a little more than 2
instead of the 4.0 that germanium gave in agreement with the periodic
chart. This was not smooth and
shinny, but a matt brown substance that furthermore slowly evolved bubbles
after being rinsed and placed in distilled water. These peculiarities
encouraged us to collect the anode gas from mass spectrometer analysis. That
was easy enough to do with an inverted test tube so we thought we could risk
giving the first specimen the glowing-ember test for hydrogen and got a
convincing “pop.” We thought that was enough weirdness to be worth mentioning in
our wrap-up report on electrolytic shaping of germanium, for research to
contemplate if they would. We also did enough testing to report that glycol
addition and higher current would produce polishing. The report was eventually published in 1956, by which time we
also published our solution of the transmod diode problem. Go
To Uhlir Oral History, Page 14 |
|
COPYRIGHT
© 2004 by Jack Ward. All Rights
Reserved. http://www.transistormuseum.com/ PAGE
13 |